Three carers in three months. You are paying £1,400 a week, covering weekends yourself, and the current carer is, in your own words, 'OK but not great.' There are expired items in the fridge. Food that should be in the freezer is not being stored properly. Your mother has mild Alzheimer's. Your father is frail and confused. And the agency, which assured you it would match carefully and give you real choice, has so far introduced three different strangers into your parents' home in ninety days.

If you are reading this at the end of a long week, wondering whether you are being unreasonable, you are not. What you described is not a run of bad luck. It is a structural problem with the way live-in care is often sold versus how it is actually delivered.

What 'careful matching' usually means in practice

When an agency tells a family it will match carefully, it usually means something narrower than families assume. It often means matching on availability and geography, with care experience and personality fit coming in a distant third and fourth. The carer who 'couldn't drive' and the one who 'left due to isolation' were not bad people. They were placed into a situation without the right preparation, without the right fit, and possibly without a real understanding of what the service users actually need from the person living alongside them.

The Homecare Association's member charter is clear that agencies should be transparent about how they match carers to families. If your agency gave you no meaningful say in who walked through the door, no chance to meet the carer before they arrived, and no process for you to raise concerns about fit before things deteriorated, then the promise of careful matching was not met. That is worth putting in writing to the agency. Keep a copy.

The food safety issue is not trivial, by the way. For someone with Alzheimer's, eating something spoiled can mean a urinary tract infection, a hospital admission, and a sharp cognitive decline that may not fully reverse. According to the Alzheimer's Society, infections are one of the most common triggers of acute deterioration in people living with dementia. So if you raised this with the agency and it was not addressed, that is a safeguarding concern, not a housekeeping complaint.

What you can actually do this week

First, write it all down. Not a diary of grievances, but a plain factual account: the dates each carer started and left, the specific food safety incidents you observed, what the care plan says about food management, and what you were told at the point of sale about continuity and matching. You need this record whether you stay with this agency, move away from it, or escalate a complaint.

Second, if you are paying through a care contract with a regulated agency, that agency is registered with the Care Quality Commission. The CQC expects registered providers to assess and monitor the quality of the service they deliver. If you believe the current arrangement poses a risk to your parents' safety, you can raise a concern directly with the CQC at cqc.org.uk. You do not need a solicitor. You do not need to have left the agency first. Raising a concern is not the same as making a formal complaint, and it does not have to be adversarial.

Third, Citizens Advice can help you understand what your contract with the agency actually entitles you to, including whether the agency is in breach of it and what your options are if you want to end the arrangement without penalty.

What good live-in care actually looks like

You should have met the carer before they arrived. Not a profile sent by email. A real conversation, ideally in person, so that you and your parents had a chance to sense whether this person could work in your family's home. Your parents should not have needed to adapt to a new stranger every few weeks. One consistent person who knows that knows your mum takes her tea a particular way, that your father gets anxious in the early evening, that you have a certain morning routine : this is not a luxury. It is what safe, person-centred care depends on.

The carer should have understood the specific tasks in the care plan before starting, not learned them after a difficult first week.

If the arrangement does not allow the family to choose the carer themselves, to meet them first, and to have a real say when something is wrong, then the arrangement is not working for your parents. It is working for administrative convenience.

Tonight, one step

If you have not already, call the Carers UK Helpline on 0808 808 7777. It is free, confidential, and staffed by people who understand exactly the position you are in: substantial money going out, imperfect care coming in, and guilt about whether you have done the right thing. They can help you think through your options without any commercial stake in the answer. Age UK's advice line on 0800 678 1602 is another good call, particularly if you want someone to talk through what your parents are entitled to expect.

If you would rather not stay in an arrangement where the agency controls who enters your parents' home and your say in the matter is mostly theoretical, this is exactly what Hibant exists for. We are a London introductory care agency. We introduce families to carers who have been DBS-checked, insurance-verified, and reference-checked by us before any introduction. You meet the carer yourself before any arrangement begins, and you choose the person. There is no coordinator standing between you and the carer on a Tuesday morning when something goes wrong. If you want to talk it through with no pressure, you can email hello@hibantcare.com, call us at 02078701352 or visit https://hibantcare.com.

Hibant

Useful links to keep handy

Looking for care or thinking of joining Hibant?

Whether you are a family navigating care for a loved one or a carer looking for fairer, more meaningful work, we would love to hear from you.

Find a carer Join as a carer
← Back to Understanding Care Questions? Get in touch